Sunday, October 11, 2015

Forest Tree Pollen in South Swedish Peat Bog Deposits - Lennart von Post (1967[1916])

Introduction by K. Faegri and J. Iversen

The Lennart von Post paper (1967) begins with an introduction stressing the vital importance of his 1916 Lecture to the 16th convention of Scandinavian naturalists in the progression of pollen analysis. Primarily a Quaternary geologist, von Post attempted to use pollen analysis as a method for investigating climatic change during the Quaternary period. Unfortunately, since his presentation was never published, the paper was difficult to access. Furthermore von Post’s “aristocratic arrogance” in believing his work to stand on its own merit, made the paper know more for its implications than its wording.

The Lecture (Translated by M.B. Davis and K. Faegri)

In the 25 years prior to 1916, investigations followed two approaches for determining the age of peat bog strata. The paleofloristic method used Japetus Steenstrup as a model, focusing on isolating and identifying plant remains from peat. The second approach led by Rutger Sernander and C.A. Weber, was paleophysiognomic. This method carefully examined the stratigraphy in an attempt to interpret the ontogeny of each bog. While both approaches are limited in their ability to provide dates to peat-bog sequences, von Post considered the paleophysiognomic approach the most successful.

Using the paloephysignomic approach, Sernander was able to identify a distinct, regularly occurring stratigraphic marker. Termed the Grenzhorizon, this subboreal-subatlantic contact was determined to coincide with the postglacial climatic deterioration. According to von Post, this horizon can be used as a starting point when using stratigraphic methods for dating peat.

Because previous methods of dating peat bog strata proved unreliable, von Post suggested that fossil pollen within the different stratigraphic layers could be used to illuminate the history of the vegetation. von Post realized during his investigations that the character of preserved pollen flora in peat was constant and characteristic for each sample. Therefore, this composition must reflect the average configuration of the pollen rain at the time of deposit. As such, pollen rain itself must be a general reflection of the forest at that time. Realizing this, von Post believed that reconstruction of the changes in pollen flora composition through a sediment profile should make it possible to observe the changes of the general makeup of the forest through time.

To test the usefulness of using pollen to reconstruct the content of peat strata, von Post examined the pollen flora of South Swedish peat bogs collected in a systematic investigation throughout 1915. Peat bogs were selected using a set of five principles: (1) large bog size; (2) be above the maximum limit of the marine transgression; (3) general features of sediments and developmental history had to be known; (4) the subboreal-subatlantic contact was clearly developed; and (5) the profiles must be from peat that completely preserved the pollen flora.

Identification of pollen flora was undertaken using 200x magnification, with higher and lower magnification settings employed depending on the coarseness of the pollen. The composition of pollen flora in a particular peat strata was calculated as a percentage based on the total number of grains in a series of preparations.

In his presentation, von Post discussed his results using a “generalized diagram based on the averages of the individual curves” (387). Unfortunately, the translators could not locate the original diagrams of the pollen curves. According to the footnotes, pollen percentages from each bog were plotted along the x-axis, while the y-axis represented individual pollen types.

von Post separated the eight main curves plotted on the diagram into three groups:

1.      The first group, consisting of birch and pine pollen. This group exhibited high frequencies at the beginning of post-glacial time that subsequently declined until its rebound in subatlantic time.
2.      The curves from the second group, mixed oak-forest, alder, and hazel pollen, show a rapid increase over time as birch and pine pollen began to decrease. Their frequency diminishes following the onset of subatlantic time.
3.      The third group, made up of beech, hornbeam, and spruce, are represented sporadically at the beginning of post glacial time. These species begin to increase along with the pine and birch during the subatlantic.

At this point in the paper, von Post discusses the precautions of using pollen diagrams. He states that in the absence of pollen productivity and dispersal indices of various trees, the diagrams are not sufficient in expressing the composition of the forest communities. Rather, they should be studied for the trends they represent of changes in frequency between forest types (390).

Taking these considerations into account, von Post concludes that trees adapted for warmer climates made their way into southern Sweden after the post-glacial period began. von Post further tested this conclusion and the potential for the use of pollen sequences in chronological relation to sea-level change following deglaciation by analyzing pollen from peat and gyttja sequences of Ancylus lake (9500-8000 BP) and Litorina sea (7500-4000 BP). Although he could not prove it, he was certain that southern forest elements immediately replaced glacial period flora in the area. An important aspect of this conclusion concerns the beech-spruce pollen limit horizon.

During his analysis, von Post found that beech and spruce occurred in low percentage frequencies throughout the profile. The beech in southern Scandinavia first appeared during the Atlantic period. Spruce pollen, however, occurred in much lower frequencies. However, von Post was inclined to believe that its history was similar to that of beech pollen. While they were most likely subordinate species during the time of mixed oak-forest, they most likely took advantage of the drier climatic conditions during subboreal time and, eventually, became the dominant species: beech in the south and spruce in the north. von Post credited the differential dominance of spruce versus beech not only to climatic conditions but also human activity.

From the pollen analyses of Ancylus lake and Litorina sea, von Post concluded that:

1.      Postglacial time can be divided into a time of mixed-oak forest and a beech-spruce forest epoch.
2.      The Ancylus maximum epoch of southern Sweden are characterized by a pollen floral with dominating pine and birch, and low frequencies of alder, elm, lime or hazel (399). These flora were later to be replaced by beech-spruce forests, distinguished by higher frequencies of these pollen.


At the end of his lecture, von Post suggested that the use of pollen curves derived from analyzing sedimentary deposits could assist providing a better understanding the changes in climate during the late Quaternary period. This conclusion was made on the basis that during the presentation he showed that the variation of pollen flora in peat diagrams could be correlated with the stratigraphy of peat bogs. In all, he hoped to someday use this research to develop comparative forest maps of the post arctic period for the different regions of the world.


Questions for Discussion
1. What were the primary contributions of this study to ecology?
2. What are the strengths and weaknesses of this paper? (Consider in both a historical and modern context)
3. Is this paper suitable as a paper included in the "Methodological Advances" section of this volume?

13 comments:

  1. What properties of pollen make it so resilient over time or is this just a property of the peat bog that preserves pollen? If it is inherent to pollen it seems that this is a really revolutionary tool for dating sediments and exploring the distribution and radiation of wind pollinated plants. However, it seems like this method might be less useful for non-wind pollinated species. VonPost mentions the fossil record matching up with the pollen record, but I’m curious as to how these match up and compliment each other now. It seems like this paper might be more appropriate for a foundations of paleoecology book, but I am certainly ignorant of how the pollen record is used in modern ecology.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that the peat bog preserves the pollen. From what I have read, it seems that bogs have very slow growth and decay-acting as large carbon sinks. Everything is wet with low nutrients so organic matter seems to be preserved. There are also several types of bogs depending on where the water is coming from( stream fed and rain fed). I do not know what kind of bog Von Post was studying but I would think that differences in where the water is coming from would have large effects on nutrients deposition, acidity, growth and decay.

      Delete
    2. So far as I know, pollen preserves best in anoxic conditions, so peat bogs would be perfect. And since pollen has a hard... shell(?)... there's something to be preserved, as opposed to very soft plants that disintegrate very easily. Apparently, pollen can remain intact for thousands of years as long as it stays wet.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. I was also curious about the pollen itself, so I did some research.... The outer layer is called "exine". The exine protects the pollen and is used for attachment to insects and/or stigmata. Often, the ornate exine structures help with attachment and are used to identify pollen grains. Wind dispersed pollen (grass and trees) tend to have smooth exine. I would think smooth exine pollen would be harder to identify, and therefore might compensate for the wind blown bias that might occur.

      http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1038/npg.els.0002039/asset/a0002039.pdf;jsessionid=9AF31E60E5C6AF372BA987147132B020.f04t02?v=1&t=ifof5nxx&s=131619bae0daf7118ad6be32a27efd1d528db34e

      Delete
  2. It is incredibly useful to know the plant community arrangements of the past and their successional trajectories over time and in response to climate. This information allows us to better understand plant community composition today. I think it is amazing that pollen can be preserved so well but the fact the Von Post was able to recognize this and developed a method that has allowed scientists to put the puzzle together is a tremendous contribution to ecology. There may be a bias of course toward wind pollenated plants but this record is still better than no record at all! In understanding how plant community ranges and distributions shift to track climate and deglaciation gives tremendous predictive power for determining the current impacts of modern climate change on ecosystems.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting to read the beginnings of palynology... something that I've been interested in for a while but have yet to really look into. I think it's especially interesting to consider the implications of studying pollen during the period of time when humans first started to civilize large areas of land. Also interesting to consider how different that world was climatically, even though temperatures were only slightly colder than they are today. And to Eric's comment, that the paper seems more suited to the paleoecology book, as far as paleo is concerned, it's not really old until you're out of the current epoch. I think it would be very interesting to understand precisely how far pollen travels on average, and how dispersal might reflect wind patterns etc.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think the use of pollen in this way was a novel idea. As I read this paper I was thinking about how I would attempt to determine what the succession of plant communities in an area. Trying to identify plant material from bogs in rodent burrows seemed useful but unreliable. However, to identify pollen in layers of bogs is a great approach. I think being able to view the diagrams would have been interesting. A quick search revealed pollen taken from lakes and bogs are still used to determine past plant communities. Attached is a diagram depicting pollen counts from a bog in Siberia. Although it is setup different from Lennart von Post’s diagram having a visual helped make his paper more palpable.

    http://www.fao.org/docrep/u6850e/u6850e0f.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  5. This paper gives an an excellent overview of the properties of peat bogs to preserve pollen. It is amazing to me that von Post came up with this method of using the information that peat bogs store, and I can see the large effect these methods would have on the field of not only palynology, but also ecology. This paper also seems to combine a lot of the theories we've studied already and that were revolutionary in their own time. Studying peat bogs lets one know the composition of a certain area at a certain point in time, and this can maybe lead to some clues regarding the surrounding areas as well. I wonder if there is any way to tell where the pollen has come from (how far away). I wouldn't really think so, but the fact that we can tell what was growing in one place at a point in time is pretty impressive in itself.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This paper is a great contribution for the field of palynology. It provided the conceptual framework to understand how plant communities are changing across time. By means of understanding different assemblages we might be able to predict response to climate change. Doing a little bit of research, this paper was published before the term palynology was coined in the literature. The downside I see if the fact that does not show any diagram for a better visualization, which would allow an accurate understanding of the information presented. The Foundations of Macroecology included a paper called Changing Patterns in Holocene Pollen Record, which shows mapped visualizations. Based on this paper the North American Pollen Data Base was created. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/napd.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. I thought this piece was a little dry and definitely suffered with the lack of figures (palynological figures are really cool). However, it brings in the long-term temporal dimensions of ecological dynamics in a way we haven't seen. Von Post's paleo-historical perspective definitely represents a step forward, and it's appropriate for the methodological section. I'm not sure the paper itself adds anything profound to ecological understanding - we don't learn much beyond a general picture of post glacial migration patterns of tree genuses (geni?) in Scandanavia - but the proof of concept, showing that we can infer something about species distribution and abundance millennia ago is significant. I believe a lot more along these lines has come out since, and very similar methods are still used today.

    I've worked a bit in historical ecology (using long-term historical witness tree records), and while sometimes you only get fuzzy picture of what was going on, the long time horizons force one to think very broadly. It seems that different methods lend themselves to different perspectives e.g. pollen v. historical records v. fossils v. tree rings (and pack rat middens?). Von Post suggests such records can be used to make inferences about past climate which seems important (this is definitely done with tree rings), though of course I'm usually most interested in the ecological implications. If there are weaknesses in the paper, beyond the lack of figures, I'd say they mostly have to do with lack of quantification, though von Post seems to have some ideas on how to develop the methods further along these lines.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that this was dry and needed some visuals. Maybe the issue is that it was translated from Swedish and the translators lacked imagination, who knows. It definitely set the foundations for looking at pollen distributions across time (strata) as a tool to help determine plant community composition changes throughout history. The pack rat middens are really cool too. Anyone that has first hand experience with Neotoma urine can understand how potent it truly is.
      PS, plural of genus is genera. :)

      Delete
  8. What should we make of James Brown's statement that preserved pollen "provides a superb record of the last 20,000 years"? Is this true? Was this true for von Post? Can we try to reconstruct von Post's diagrams from his descriptions? If pollen percentages are on the x-axis and pollen types are on the y-axis, where is time and where is geographic location in the graph? Can we refer to the paper mentioned by Carlos and make a map? Here's a start on a time-scale, from Wikipedia:
    Holocene/Anthropocene
    Preboreal (10.3–9 ka)
    Boreal (9–7.5 ka)
    Atlantic (7.5–5 ka)
    Subboreal (5–2.5 ka)
    Subatlantic (2.5 ka–present)

    ReplyDelete